From owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Sun Mar 28 14:59:31 1999
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.2+3.1W/8.7.3) id OAA00467;
	Sun, 28 Mar 1999 14:59:31 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from coral.ocn.ne.jp (coral.ocn.ne.jp [202.234.232.80])
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.2+3.1W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA00462
	for <FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 14:59:30 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from takehiro@coral.ocn.ne.jp)
Received: from eva00.ocn.ad.jp by coral.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id OAA21848; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 14:59:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 14:59:46 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199903280559.OAA21848@coral.ocn.ne.jp>
To: FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Cc: takehiro@coral.ocn.ne.jp
From: takehiro@coral.ocn.ne.jp (Takehiro Suzuki)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.21] 1997-12/23(Tue)
Reply-To: FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+981115
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-users-jp 40253
Subject: [FreeBSD-users-jp 40253] PAO for 2.2.8-stable?
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: takehiro@coral.ocn.ne.jp

$B$3$s$K$A$O!#NkLZ(B $B3YBg$H?=$7$^$9!#(B

shutdown -x$B$GEE8;CG$r$5$;$k$?$a$K;W$$@Z$C$F(BFreeBSD 2.2.8-stable$B$K(B
2.2.8-Release$BMQ$N(BPAO Patch$B$rEv$F$F$_$^$7$?(B($BI>2A4D6-$O%G%9%/%H%C%W(B:
$B%^%6!<%\!<%I$O(BASuS P2B)$B!#(Breject$B$5$l$k(Bpatch$B$O0J2<$NDL$j$G$9!#(B


1. /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT
 $BLdBj$,$J$$$3$H$O$[$\3N<B(B


2. /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c
 $B;d$O(BLS-120$B$r;H$C$F$$$J$$$N$GL5;k(B


3. /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c
 ESS$B$N=i4|2=4X78$N$H$3$m$KJQ99$,F~$C$F$$$k!#;d$O%5%&%s%I%A%C%W$N$3$H$K$D$$$F(B
 $B$^$C$?$/CN$i$J$$$N$G(BCreative Lab$B$N%+!<%I(B($B;d$O(BAWE64$B$r;HMQ(B)$B$K$O4X78$J$$$@$m$&(B
 $B$H7h$a9~$s$G$H$j$"$($:L5;k(B($BK\Ev$N$H$3$m$r65$($F2<$5$$(B (^^; )$B!#(B


4. /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h
 $B%_%-%5$N=i4|2=;~$K;H$&%Q%i%a!<%?$NJQ99!#$H$j$"$($:L\$r$D$`$k!#(B


$B$H$j$"$($:CWL?E*$JLdBj$,5/$3$j$=$&$J$H$3$m$O$J$+$C$?$N$G$3$NItJ,$NJQ99$r(B
$BL5;k$7(B,$B$3$l$i$N%U%!%$%k$K$D$$$F$O85$N$b$N$r;HMQ$7$F%+!<%M%k$N:F9=C[$r(B
$B$7$^$7$?!#7k2L(B,$B:#$N$H$3$mLdBj$J$/F0:n$7$F$$$^$9!#(B

"shutdown -x"$B$GEE8;CG$G$-$k$h$&$K$J$C$F$+$J$j9,$;$K$O$J$C$?$N$G$9$,(B
zzz$B$,;H$($J$$$N$O$A$g$C$HHa$7$$(B(;_;)$B!#0l=V%5%9%Z%s%I$7$F$9$0%l%8%e!<%`(B
$B$7$F$7$^$&$N$O$J$<$J$s$G$7$g$&(B? > $B<1<T$NJ}(B

#Plamo Linux$B$G$O(B"apm -s"$B$G%5%9%Z%s%I$7$?$N$G$J$*$5$i(B....

$B0J2<$K(BFreeBSD 2.2.8-stable$B$K(BPAO 2.2.8-Relese$B$rEv$F$?;~$N(B
log$B$NH4?h$rE:IU$7$^$9!#(B

--------------------------
|Index: PAO/sys/i386/conf/LINT
|diff -c PAO/sys/i386/conf/LINT:1.1.1.4 PAO/sys/i386/conf/LINT:1.1.1.4.2.1
|*** PAO/sys/i386/conf/LINT:1.1.1.4	Sat Dec  5 05:35:54 1998
|--- PAO/sys/i386/conf/LINT	Sun Dec  6 07:46:22 1998
--------------------------
Patching file conf/LINT using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 665.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to conf/LINT.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: PAO/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c
|diff -c PAO/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c:1.1.1.2 PAO/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c:1.1.1.2.4.1
|*** PAO/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c:1.1.1.2	Fri Jul 24 19:18:54 1998
|--- PAO/sys/i386/isa/wfd.c	Sun Dec  6 07:48:01 1998
--------------------------
Patching file isa/wfd.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 23.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 72.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 149.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 192.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 217.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 295.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 408.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 863.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 873.
1 out of 9 hunks failed--saving rejects to isa/wfd.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c
|diff -c PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c:1.1.1.3 PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c:1.1.1.3.2.1
|*** PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c:1.1.1.3	Sat Dec  5 05:38:55 1998
|--- PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sb_dsp.c	Mon Dec 21 20:47:28 1998
--------------------------
Patching file isa/snd/sb_dsp.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 35.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 80.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 329.
Hunk #4 failed at 441.
Hunk #5 failed at 502.
Hunk #6 failed at 599.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 654 (offset 43 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 732 (offset 43 lines).
Hunk #9 failed at 832.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 833 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 887 (offset 43 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 981 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 1166 (offset 43 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1224 (offset 8 lines).
4 out of 14 hunks failed--saving rejects to isa/snd/sb_dsp.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h
|diff -c PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h:1.1.1.3 PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h:1.1.1.3.2.1
|*** PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h:1.1.1.3	Sat Dec  5 05:38:56 1998
|--- PAO/sys/i386/isa/snd/sbcard.h	Mon Dec 21 20:47:29 1998
--------------------------
Patching file isa/snd/sbcard.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 140.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 213.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 266.
Hunk #5 failed at 281.
Hunk #6 failed at 297.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 329.
2 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to isa/snd/sbcard.h.rej
done

$BNkLZ(B $B3YBg(B
takehiro@coral.ocn.ne.jp




