From owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Dec  9 21:28:57 1996
Received: by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.3+2.6Wbeta9/8.7.3) id VAA10162
	Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:28:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.3+2.6Wbeta9/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA10157
	for <FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:28:55 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from nws830@localhost) by i386.my.domain (8.7.5/3.5Wbeta-96091013) id VAA14140 for FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:29:19 +0900 (JST)
From: Hiroshi Murakami <nws830@ca2.so-net.or.jp>
Message-Id: <199612091229.VAA14140@i386.my.domain>
To: FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:29:18 +0900 (JST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-to: <nws830@ca2.so-net.or.jp>
X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=19]
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-users-jp 7326
Subject: [FreeBSD-users-jp 7326] Most stable gcc with Pentium optimization or patch?
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.freebsd.org


Pentium $@BP1~$N%3!<%I$rEG$/(J gcc $@$G$b$C$H$b0BDj$7$F$$$k$b$N$d(J,
$@:GE,2=$,$+$J$j$NDxEY$^$GGKC>$7$J$$(J version $@$d(J
$@$=$l$NCV$$$F$"$k>l=j$r$4B8CN$G$7$?$i$I$&$+65$($F$/$@$5$$(J.
$@$=$NB>!";HMQ$7$F$_$F5$$,$D$$$?E@$d(J bug-fix patch $@$J$I$b(J
$@$4B8CN$G$7$?$i$I$&$+65$($F2<$5$$(J.

# $@$A$g$C$H<j$K$$$l$F$_$?(J 2.7.2p$@$@$+$O!"(J
# $@%P%0$N$"$k%3!<%I$rEG$$$F$$$k798~$,9b$$$_$?$$$J$N$G(J.
